Optimal false-name-proof single-item redistribution mechanisms
نویسندگان
چکیده
Although the celebrated Vickrey auction is strategy-proof and guaranteed to achieve an efficient allocation in a singleobject auction, if there exists no outside party (i.e., a seller or an auctioneer) with the right to collect the payment, the collected payment will be wasted. Redistribution mechanisms try to redistribute the payment to participating agents as much as possible without violating strategy-proofness. However, when a losing agent can obtain part of the payment, she may have an incentive to participate under multiple identities and receive a greater share of the redistribution. Our goal is to develop false-name-proof redistribution mechanisms that are robust against such manipulations. First, we prove that no mechanism simultaneously satisfies falsename-proofness and allocative efficiency, except for the Vickrey auction. Next, we propose a class of false-name-proof redistribution mechanisms, which are characterized by several parameters. We show that each mechanism in the class is not dominated by any other false-name-proof mechanism in terms of social welfare. Precisely, by choosing these parameters appropriately, all instances of this class are guaranteed to achieve at least the same amount of social welfare obtained by any false-name-proof mechanism. Furthermore, we formalize an optimization problem that determines appropriate parameter values based on prior information about participating agents.
منابع مشابه
Worst-case efficiency ratio in false-name-proof combinatorial auction mechanisms
This paper analyzes the worst-case efficiency ratio of falsename-proof combinatorial auction mechanisms. False-nameproofness generalizes strategy-proofness by assuming that a bidder can submit multiple bids under fictitious identifiers. Even the well-known Vickrey-Clarke-Groves mechanism is not false-name-proof. It has previously been shown that there is no false-name-proof mechanism that alway...
متن کاملFalse-name-proofness in online mechanisms
In real electronic markets, each bidder arrives and departs over time. Thus, such a mechanism that must make decisions dynamically without knowledge of the future is called an online mechanism. In an online mechanism, it is very unlikely that the mechanism designer knows the number of bidders beforehand or can verify the identity of all of them. Thus, a bidder can easily submit multiple bids (f...
متن کاملFairness and False-Name Manipulations in Randomized Cake Cutting
Cake cutting has been recognized as a fundamental model in fair division, and several envy-free cake cutting algorithms have been proposed. Recent works from the computer science field proposed novelmechanisms for cake cutting, whose approaches are based on the theory of mechanism design; these mechanisms are strategy-proof, i.e., no agent has any incentive to misrepresent her utility function,...
متن کاملApproximating Exact Budget-Balance with VCG Redistribution Mechanisms
In many auction problems, we consider a selfinterested seller who is allocating item(s) to bidders in exchange for payments. The highly celebrated VCG mechanism provides an auction mechanism in this case that is efficient, strategy-proof, and ex post individually rational (IR). If the seller’s goal is to maximize revenue, alternative mechanisms include the Myerson optimal auction, which maximiz...
متن کاملA Comparative Study of Multi-Attribute Continuous Double Auction Mechanisms
Auctions have been as a competitive method of buying and selling valuable or rare items for a long time. Single-sided auctions in which participants negotiate on a single attribute (e.g. price) are very popular. Double auctions and negotiation on multiple attributes create more advantages compared to single-sided and single-attribute auctions. Nonetheless, this adds the complexity of the auctio...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014